Reading Joseph Boone’s
piece I have to pause a bit at the head line. The theory he poses (stated below
by others in the blog, so it feels weird to rewrite it), is that of escape from
the confines of society – which can be narrowed down to mainstream culture + heterosexual
marriage. It’s very clear to the modern reader of Moby Dick, and right from the
point he writes ‘Hidden’ (smaller headline), my thought was – ‘yeah, right,
hidden’. Even Boone himself finds so much evidence easily entered into the ‘escape
from culture and the closet’. The word Hidden should have been stricken out.
But considering Melville’s times, where things of that sort moved more around
the naïve and ignorant, when regarding homosexuality, this is more my reaction
(and probably anyone else reading today), and I keep trying to remind myself,
while reading, that Melville was operating under a stricter set of rules, and
so – yes, he was hiding.
On the actual thesis
though, I have to say that while not ruling it out, it should be worth
mentioning that there’s a thesis relating to 19th century quests as
a different kind of escape. This thesis, presented well by Amy Greenberg in the
excellent book ‘Manifest Manhood and the Antebellum American Empire’, argues
differently. While maintaining the escape from society back to a sort of lawlessness,
Greenberg shows that Antebellum expansionism is performed mostly by men only, in
what grew to be called Filibusters. This is a savage, lawless expansionism,
inconsiderate of the local populace, which Greenberg sees as the last opening
of a pressure valve of manliness (after violent sports and secret fraternities
and right before the civil war). She details several novels of the period and
other reading sources, depicting the adventures of William Walker, who conquered
Nicaragua, and Gaston Raousset-Boulbon running around Mexico. Gaston, for
example, is depicted as conquering both the country and the women. Using The
Greenberg thesis places Moby Dick in the middle of other books of his decade
(much better selling) regarding filibustering, pieces like ‘Gaston the little
Wolf’ and ‘The Story of Blannerhasset’ which is a cautionary tale on that
topic. This is a different kind of escape, to savage, almost Darwinian,
conquest – a totally different personal freedom. And while one can argue about
the sexual escape that is hidden under the surface of Moby Dick, one cannot
ignore the masculine escape of killing whales and conquering the sea, out there in the open.
No comments:
Post a Comment