In his different works, Samuel
George Morton analyzes crania in order to get to the depth of human character.
Through his measurements, says Otter in his chapter "Getting inside
heads", Morton tries to prove that American Indians and African Americans
are inferior races. This is racial science, Otter goes on to say, in which Morton upholds
white supremacy by understanding intellectual character through physical
characteristics.
Otter goes on to show how in Moby
Dick, Melville raises questions about the ability of making dry bones speak. In
the cetology chapters, Melville employs an ethnological discourse, but in a way
that defamiliarizes the standard 19th century system of corporeal
inquiry. The anatomy chapters are part of Ishmael's attempt to fathom the
whale, but simultaneously, the limits of such inquiry are exposed; it becomes
evident that bodily knowledge can also disarticulate the object.
In the chapter "Stubb's
supper", Melville leads the reader to view Fleece through Stubb's eyes. In
our first encounter with him, we learn about his appearance: an "old black" who "like many
old blacks" has "something the matter with his knee-pans", a
condition that makes him shuffle and limp. Through Stubb, we are led to view
Fleece in the same manner that the "American school" read racial
character in physical appearance.
Stubb who is "flushed with
conquest" after killing the whale apparently wants to show the same superiority
over Fleece, as he tells him that the noises the sharks are making are
disturbing his dinner, and won’t Fleece "go and talk to the sharks" because "they must keep quiet".
Fleece has no choice but to cooperate, and we see him humiliated as he tries to
reason with the sharks. But as Fleece continues with his pleas, the dynamics of
the relationship change as Fleece, between the lines, demonstrates his
intellectual superiority. He starts to philosophize and when he speaks about
governing "dat wicked natur" we get the sense that he is talking
about Stubb, not the sharks. We know he is not really trying to reason with the
sharks, but is actually talking through them to Stubb. "If you gobern de
shark in you, why den you be angel; for all angel is not'ing more dan de shark
well goberned." In this sense, the "wicked natur" of the white
man can never be erased, only governed. He continues and says "none of you
has de right to dat whale; dat whale belongs to someone else". Technically
that "someone else" is Stubb, but is it really possible to own the
whale in this narrative? Fleece knows it is impossible, and by saying
"none of you", Stubb is included. "To own the whale is to know
the whale", Otter tells us, and again and again we see how the attempts of
striking through the mask are hindered.
Fleece goes on to show how the
body does not reflect the interior, by pointing out how some of the sharks have
"very brig mouth", but these "brig mouts" are fronts that
conceal "small bellies". Similarly, Otter points out how Melville repeatedly
shows us that "the skeleton of the whale does not accurately reflect the
whale's body".
great reading of Fleece - works really well with Otter's chapter.
ReplyDelete