The
fact that Captain Ahab, and of course Moby Dick himself, were actually added to
the book on later stages of the writing, the last (which is actually also the
first, both chronologically and ontologically speaking) dragging the other after
him as if by the same morbid necessity that can be pictured throughout the tragic
events of the book, - to me, historically true or not, anyway it`s a beautiful
one.
A
British Captain`s hand was also taken by Moby Dick, but instead of chasing him
he would run away from ever again getting near him. With a good spirit he playfully
makes jokes and word-games with his friend the doctor, describing the events of
his loss: they have their language to fall upon for their enjoyment,
leaving pain itself behind their backs. Shakespeare`s beauty of language, even
in the darkest hours, is there to give comfort by pleasure. The British Captain
knows of Captain Ahab`s madness and pain – but he does not share it, surely not
as the constant presence it`s made of, that cannot really be grasped by
description. Others would go sailing finding whales, writing the selling novell;
that would be nothing like going madly chasing The White Whale Moby Dick,
trying to capture Truth within words (many letters already stuck in it`s right
side) – better or worse, legend or not.
I like the way your own indifference to truth in favor of beauty ("historically ture or not. . .it's beautiful") reenacts the message about aesthetic pleasure over truth and pain that you find in the text.
ReplyDelete